My son struck out all three at bats on Saturday.

“I need to work on my hitting.”

Took him to the batting cage Sunday. Shortened his swing.

Challenged him to have at least one game this season with zero strikeouts.

He achieved that tonight.

Love the instant gratification.

Lots of birds on the move in the eastern U.S. tonight #BirdNerds #Migration

Too late. Nothing says 2024 in America quite like “guess I’ll drive over to my kid’s high school since they’re on lockdown because of a bomb threat”.

VCs after hearing a founder say “orthogonal”

The image of everyone holding up their cell phones is objectively funny.

Daily Mail admits making up story about electric vehicles causing potholes - Grantham Research Institute on climate change and the environment lse.ac.uk/granthaminstit…

“We want to make sure everyone in the liberated zone thinks exactly like we do.”

Good game, good effort Yale.

There are always a million reasons why a good idea can fail.

Look instead to those succeeding with the same basic good idea.

Is that good?

THE COST OF CLIMATE INACTION WILL BE FAR GREATER THAN THE COST OF CLIMATE ACTION 🗣️ 🗣️

As America’s paper of record, we believe in simply reporting facts and letting our readers draw their own conclusions. Here’s why we issued a news release explaining what our publisher meant when he hounded the vice president about not getting a one-on-one interview with Biden.

I’m honestly completely shocked to learn it wasn’t already retired. Perhaps the best on the team all-time. And a heck of a gentleman.

“Don’t spend all your time worrying about decarbonising the last 10%” says Michael Liebreich. We can decarbonise all land transport, heating and a bunch of industry with solutions that already exist.

#acceleratetonetzero

Is there any more useless exercise than when the gate agents try to entice people to check their carry-ons “free of charge”? Is that supposed to be an incentive?

Is that good?

As with the three-hour argument in Trump v. Anderson, a disconcertingly precious little of the two-hour argument today was even devoted to the specific and only question presented for decision.

Everyone at SF Climate Week has been talking about solving 'The Missing Middle' like it's a new term... ahem: forbes.com/sites/robday/2…

At a very basic level, this SCOTUS argument to me seems to come down to one basic question: When a President's potentially illegal (tbd) behavior can be construed as BOTH for official and personal purposes, should the courts defer to protection for former or liability for latter?

Unpopular opinion: Take Trump-specifics out of this SCOTUS situation and it’s actually a very fascinating constitutional question worthy of better understanding by the court.

This is why finding data center solutions that require little or even NO cooling is so cool #punintended Soluna